We've found lawmakers paying expenses through their campaign, then seeking reimbursement for those same expenses from taxpayers.more>>
Lawmakers pay for expenses out of two pots of money: their campaign account, funded by contributors, and legislative expense accounts, funded by taxpayers. We've found lawmakers paying expenses through their campaign, then seeking reimbursement for those same expenses from taxpayers. It's just the latest finding in our "Louisiana Purchased" probe of campaign finances.more>>
Some former politicians such as Kathleen Blanco are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars from their campaign funds, even though they have no plans to run for office again. more>>
Some former politicians such as Kathleen Blanco are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars from their campaign funds, even though they have no plans to run for office again. Is that legal? Don't be too surprised by the answer.more>>
After possibly breaking the law, a state lawmaker files a bill that would make a similar violation in the future legal.more>>
After possibly breaking the law, a state lawmaker files a bill that would make a similar violation in the future legal. It's the latest development in our "Louisiana Purchased" joint investigation with NOLA.com/The Times-Picayune.more>>
The bill would force elected officials to make more detailed explanations on their campaign finance filings that show where they've spent their campaign money.more>>
Two New Orleans-area lawmakers have filed a bill that addresses several of the stories from our "Louisiana Purchased" series, the joint investigation between FOX 8 News and NOLA.com/The Times-Picayune. The bill would force elected officials to make more detailed explanations on their campaign finance filings that show where they've spent their campaign money.more>>
In four years, some elected officials spent almost $500,000 in campaign funds, writing off meals and gifts as constituent-related expenses. By no means do the questionable expenditures stop there.more>>
In four years, a group of elected officials spent almost half a million dollars out of their campaign war chests, writing off meals and gifts as constituent-related expenses. And by no means do the questionable expenditures stop there. These findings are the latest in our "Louisiana Purchased" joint investigation of campaign finance with NOLA.com/The Times-Picayune.more>>
BATON ROUGE, LA (WVUE) -
Our "Louisiana Purchased" series helped change laws in the state's 2014 legislative session. One good government group says, while it's a step in the right direction, the reforms still don't address some big picture issues.
In the past, simple words lacking detail - "reimbursement," for instance, or "meal" - have been good enough to pass the ethics test in our state.
Under House Bill 1079, both of these lawmakers would have to provide more information about such campaign expenses in the future.
Rep. Tim Burns, primary author of HB 1079, says the bill will "require that the use be clarified better... that it's used for a political or campaign purpose."
Burns' bill forces politicians to be more descriptive in relating expenses to campaigns or their public office.
"You have a new law which says you've got to give a description," notes Robert Travis Scott, president of the Public Affairs Research Council of Louisiana. "What we're hoping is that this will have a little bit of a chilling effect on those office holders or campaigners who might be tempted to spend some of the money in an inappropriate way, that they'll know they have to provide a description of it."
What the new law doesn't do is define which expenses are legal and which are forbidden.
"None of this changes exactly what is okay to spend your campaign finance money on," says Scott. "It doesn't make new things eligible for it and some things not. This is the same standard as we had before, but it is a different standard of disclosure."
So this won't stop many politicians from spending money on meals, football tickets, gas or gifts.
The head of PAR says the law is a good step, but a small one; the campaign finance system will still allow for questionable spending.
"The whole idea here is, if you're taking a campaign donation and then converting that into spending on something for yourself, to enrich yourself or to enrich your family or to enhance your lifestyle, then it's really not that much different from a bribe," says Scott. "You may even have donors who want to give you money, knowing that you're going to use it for yourself personally."
This year's reforms aside, state law will continue to allow politicians to pay for meals and reimbursements, as long as they provide just a little more detail on their campaign finance report.
"I think it is a good first step," says Burns, who chairs the House and Governmental Affairs Committee. "Let's just see what it produces, if you will, in disclosure and in the next wave of reports that it will be subject to. And I think we'll just take a look and see if any more action is required."
HB 264 and HB 1079 await Governor Bobby Jindal's signature.
Other campaign finance bills considered this session include the following:
HB 107 (Ritchie): Would have prohibited legislators from taking campaign contributions from people nominated for Tulane University scholarships that lawmakers award and from the nominees' families (considered by House committee but did not advance).
HB 321 (Hensgens): Would have required a person or company with a state contract of $10,000 or more to disclose contributions in statewide elections for two years before and two years after the contract's signing (referred to House committee, never considered).
HB 695 (Burns): Gives the Ethics Board authority to request clarification or additional information from candidates regarding campaign finance disclosures (passed both houses; sent to governor for signature).
SB 218 (Dorsey-Colomb): Would have raised aggregate limits for PAC contributions to let candidates take an additional $40,000 per election cycle (considered by Senate committee, did not advance).
SB 303 (Amedee): Would remove a requirement that the Ethics Board launches an investigation before filing charges for failure to file financial disclosure forms (passed both houses; sent to governor for signature).
SB 394 (Morrell): Would prohibit people who owe ethics fines of $250 or more from being appointed to any state or local board (passed both houses; sent to governor for signature).
For some, it may be hard to believe that nine years have passed since Hurricane Katrina made landfall and left major devastation in Louisiana and Mississippi. Most people will never forget where theymore>>
Friday marks nine years since Hurricane Katrina made landfall, causing major devastation in Louisiana and Mississippi.more>>
A cloud of locusts Clouds of insects slowed traffic Thursday in Madagascar's capitol city of Antananarivo. The island nation has been dealing with locusts for more than two years. The government announcedmore>>
While you were sleeping, the Internet never stopped. Here's what's trending today.more>>
SLIDELL, La. (AP) - As George Clooney and Sandra Bullock prepare this fall to shoot the political comedy "Our Brand Is Crisis," in New Orleans, producers are looking for locals interested in appearingmore>>
As George Clooney and Sandra Bullock prepare this fall to shoot the political comedy "Our Brand Is Crisis," in New Orleans, producers are looking for locals interested in appearing as extras in the film.more>>
A tropical wave is moving from the Caribbean into the Gulf of Mexico. The circulation is over land right now, but it is worth watching as it pushes west. It is not likely anything will develop untilmore>>
The only area worth watching at the moment is a wave currently over the Yucatan. The wave will move westward today and once over the Bay of Campeche, further development is possible.more>>
Fox 8 WVUE-TV
Louisiana Media Company, LLC.
1025 S. Jefferson Davis Parkway
New Orleans, LA 70125